Results 1 to 4 of 4

Thread: Could Einstein's Cosmological Constant equal Planck Frequency squared - Antigravity?

  1. #1
    Banned apibernik's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Posts
    1,830
    Blog Entries
    46
    Likes Received
    96
    Likes Given
    242

    Could Einstein's Cosmological Constant equal Planck Frequency squared - Antigravity?

    Q represents: the quantum speed of thinking in the human brain (in quantum steps per second), which was later defined as a linear x angular movement of a particle with a linear x angular frequency.

    E=Energy in Joules
    m=mass in kg
    Q=the quantum speed of thinking in the human brain (in quantum steps per second)

    (1) E=mQ²

    Q now represents a halt of a torsion wave of the particle as we defined Volt as circumference c or AZ² in Al Zeeper terms. The halt takes place due to the elimination of the spins or π² within Q².

    In Max Planck quantum mechanical units Q now represents:

    (2) Q=gpTp² / π x π / Tp

    We however need to put Q to the square in order to halt the torsion wave and transform the mass back into energy.

    (3) Q²=gp²Tp^4 / π² x π² / Tp²

    (4) Q²=gp²Tp² is the same as velocity squared or c² the speed of light squared in Planck terms.

    One could write the equations also the following way:

    (5) E = m x circumference² x frequency²
    or
    (6) E = m x Volt² x frequency² but as we defined frequency² or 1/Tp² as antigravity or Einstein’s Cosmological Constant Λ we get:

    (7) Eii=mV²Λ

    Here we arrive to the point where we can define Orgone Energy with m = l or mass = distance in Planck terms m = Volt/π or m = gpTp²

    (8) Ei=V³Λ

    Eii=Electrical Energy
    Ei=Orgone Energy organic Growth Energy or Acceleration over an Area same as:

    (9) Planck Volume / Planck Time² or:

    (10) Orgone Energy = Planck Acceleration over Planck Area = √cħG

    c=the speed of light
    ħ=Planck Reduced Constant
    G=Gravitational Constant

    In Alan Zeeper's terms Orgone Energy would be written as:

    (11) Ei=A³Z^6 / Z²

    (12) Ei=A³Z^4 or in Planck terms:

    (13) Ei=gp³Tp^4 is the same as Planck Acceleration over a Planck Area gpLp².

    gp=Planck Acceleration
    Lp=Planck Length
    Tp=Planck Time

    A=Acceleration, Z=Time in Alan Zeeper terms

    In Alan Zeeper's terms Orgone Energy is nothing else than a celestial body movement that spins and produces heat A²Z³ along its orbit at a certain linear velocity or temperature AZ.

    Heat x Temperature or A²Z³ x AZ = Acceleration over an Area = Orgone Energy or square root (speed of light x Planck Reduced Constant x Gravitational Constant) which is √cħG in quantum mechanical terms.

    A clear proof that Alan Zeeper not only unified Gravity with Electromagnetism but our E=mQ² also unified Gravity and Electromagnetism with Quantum Mechanics.

    Orgone Energy can be also written as:

    (14) Ei=Volt x speed of light² or Ei=Vc² or Ei=VA²Z² or Ei=Lpgp²Tp² which is Ei=Lp³/Tp²

    Q=angular velocity (heat) x linear velocity (temperature) whereas the quantum steps per second or angular and linear frequencies are as far as Orgone Energy is concerned irrelevant. This means time is not important and proves what Srečko Šorli Amrit Nirvikar said, that time is only a numerical order of material change and only has a mathematical character being invented by us humans. It has been said that everything is music or sound and it all consists of frequencies. Matter is displayed as the Electrical-Mass on different frequencies or there is no space if there is no sound or frequency. Than it is logical to put Planck Frequency squared; –s² or 1/Tp² for the Cosmological Constant, otherwise life or Organic Growth would be impossible. If we have Volume or Distance³ we need to multiply this Volume or Distance³ by Frequency² in order to obtain Orgone Energy which is Acceleration over an Area. A few years ago the author had a longer conversation with a girl who played Organ and she said to him that one day her music professor all excited about a new scientific discovery came into her classroom and told her that we are all music and that big bang was triggered by a wave, a frequency or music. To the author this means that time first evolves and than after a certain period ceases to exist. We are heading towards the end of times into an infinite eternity … ∞

  2. #2
    Banned apibernik's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Posts
    1,830
    Blog Entries
    46
    Likes Received
    96
    Likes Given
    242


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No

    Re: Could Einstein's Cosmological Constant equal Planck Frequency squared - Antigravi

    E=V³Λ as m=V/π and E=mV²Λ is E=mQ²

    m=Electrical-Mass or Planck Mass 10^-8 kg (it's Pressure forms Gravity)
    V=Volt 10^-35 m (V is a unit of circumference)
    Λ=Einstein's Cosmological Constant 10^86 -s² π/Tp² (Antigravity)

    V²Λ=v² velocity squared or c² in Planck Terms
    VΛ=gp Planck Acceleration or Gravity, Tp=Planck Time
    Λ=Planck Acceleration over the Planck Area. Organic GROWTH referred to as dematerialized or spontaneous production of Energy and Golden ratio proportioning
    Q=the quantum speed of thinking in the human brain (in quantum steps per second)

    Q²=V²/π² x π²Λ=Velocity squared (pure Mathematics and Geometry)

  3. #3
    Banned apibernik's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Posts
    1,830
    Blog Entries
    46
    Likes Received
    96
    Likes Given
    242


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No

    Re: Could Einstein's Cosmological Constant equal Planck Frequency squared - Antigravi

    An old forgotten idea I wanted to discuss here on TOE? Einstein said that gravity is a frequency phenomenon, why shouldn't antigravity on the quantum level be Planck Frequency squared. Old Egyptians used vibrations/frequencies to move large stone blocks? Could this be done today? Can we revolutionize the aircraft propulsion system sucking billions of tons of kerosine?


  4. #4
    Banned apibernik's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Posts
    1,830
    Blog Entries
    46
    Likes Received
    96
    Likes Given
    242


    Did you find this post helpful? Yes | No

    Re: Could Einstein's Cosmological Constant equal Planck Frequency squared - Antigravi

    Dear guests see:


Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Rethinking the Cosmological Constant
    By RascalPuff in forum Theorems and Conjectures
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 11-27-2007, 06:04 PM
  2. Cosmological constant
    By RascalPuff in forum Universe Expansion
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 11-11-2007, 04:29 PM
  3. Reinstatement of Abandoned Cosmological Constant
    By RascalPuff in forum Your TOE Theory
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 04-21-2007, 06:32 PM
  4. Replies: 4
    Last Post: 04-21-2007, 04:16 PM
  5. cosmological constant
    By AntonioLao in forum Cosmology
    Replies: 54
    Last Post: 11-07-2005, 01:33 PM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •